Paxx Reloaded

Wieder da: Sex-, Drugs-, Peace- and Rock'n'Roll Libertarians

9/11 – Never forget!

with 2 comments

Niemals vergessen, was die Ursache dieser Tragödie des 11. September war (und fortwirkend ist) und welche 10 Schlüsse wir daraus zu ziehen haben, erinnert uns Sheldon Richman:


1. Killing one or many innocents, regardless of one’s grievances, is monstrous. This elementary principle would seem to apply to George Bush, and now Barack Obama, as much as to Osama bin Laden. Can someone say why it doesn’t?

2. Despite all its guarantees — contrary to its ideological justification for existing — the state can’t protect us — even from a ragtag group of hijackers. Trillions of dollars spent over many years built a „national security apparatus“ that could not stop attacks on the two most prominent buildings in the most prominent city in the country — or its own headquarters. That says a lot. No. That says it all. The state is a fraud. We have been duped.

3. The shameless state will stop at nothing to keep people’s support by scaring the hell out of them. (Robert Higgs writes about this.) That people take its claims about „why they hate us“ seriously after 9/11 shows what the public schools and the mass media are capable of doing to people. But the people are not absolved of responsibility: they could think their way out of this if they cared to make the effort.

4. Blowback is real. Foreign-policy makers never think how their decisions will harm Americans, much less others. They never wonder how their actions will look to their targets. That’s because they are state employees.

5. As Randolph Bourne said, getting into a war is like riding a wild elephant. You may think you are in control — you may believe your objectives and only your objectives are what count. If so, you are deluded. Consider the tens of thousands of dead and maimed Iraqi and Afghanis. What did they have to do with 9/11?

6. No one likes an occupying power.

7. Victims of foreign intervention don’t forget, even if the perpetrators and their subjects do.

8. Terrorism is not an enemy. It’s a tactic, one used by many different kinds of people in causes of varying moral hues, often against far stronger imperial powers. Declaring all those people one’s enemy is criminally reckless. But it’s a damn good way for a government to achieve potentially total power over its subjects.

9. They say the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Maybe, maybe not. But it seems abundantly clear that the enemy of my friend is also likely to be my enemy. See the U.S.-Israel relationship for details.

10. Assume „your“ government is lying.


2 Antworten

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. *Unterschreib*

    Holger S.

    27. September 2010 at 03:01

  2. Aber laut dem NOBELPREISTRÄGER Paul Krugman ist doch 9/11 soooo gut für die Wirtschaft gewesen. Hat die Nachfrage stimuliert und so. Wenn es also gut für die Wirtschaft war, wie kann man dann 9/11 als was schlechtes betrachten? Ergo müssten ja mehr Terroranschläge die Wirtschaft noch mehr stimulieren. Warum will dann die USA weitere Terroranschläge verhindern?
    Naja, wie auch immer, wenn mein Idol Paul Krugman das sagt, dann wird es schon stimmen. Wie wenn er über den Staat spricht. „THE STATE IS LIGHT“. Wusste ich doch schon immer 😛


    27. September 2010 at 17:46

Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Abmelden /  Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Verbinde mit %s

%d Bloggern gefällt das: